- Oral arguments before the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court concerning the “improper industrial use” of conservation lands on Maunakea are set for September 22 at 10 a.m.
- Petitioners Kuʻulei Higashi Kanahele and Ahiena Kanahele are appealing a State Land Use Commission denial of their request for declaratory relief, saying that the development of thirteen astronomy facilities, including the Thirty Meter Telescope, was not appropriate within a conservation district on Maunakea.
- The oral arguments will also be livestreamed for public viewing via the Judiciary’s YouTube channel.
From the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court:
Attorneys for Appellants Kuʻulei Higashi Kanahele and Ahiena Kanahele:
Bianca Isaki of the Law Office of Bianca Isaki, and Lance D. Collins of the Law Office of Lance D Collins
Attorneys for Appellee TMT International Observatory LLC:
J. Douglas Ing, Brian A. Kang, Ross T. Shinyama, and Summer H. Kaiawe of Watahabe Ing LLP
Attorneys for Appellee University of Hawaiʻi:
Carrie K. S. Okinaga, General Counsel, Gary Y. Takeuchi, Deputy General Counsel, Jesse K. Souki, and Joseph F. Kotowski, III, Associate General Counsel
Attorneys for Appellee Land Use Commission, State of Hawaiʻi:
Patricia Ohara and Lori N. Tanigawa, Deputy Attorneys General, and Miranda C. Steed, Deputy Attorneys General
NOTE: Order assigning Circuit Judge Lisa W. Cataldo due to a vacancy, filed 07/31/20.
NOTE: Order granting motion to postpone oral argument from 08/04/22 to 09/22/22 at 10:00 a.m., filed 07/14/22.
COURT: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Cataldo due to a vacancy.
Brief Description:
Between 1968 and 2017, the Department of Land and Natural Resources (“DLNR”), through the Board of Land and Natural Resources, has issued thirteen conservation district use permits for the construction and operation of astronomy facilities on the Mauna Kea Science Reserve, land classified as a conservation district. Petitioners, Ku’ulei Higashi Kanahele and Ahiena Kanahele (the “Kanaheles”) appeal from a November 29, 2019 decision of the Land Use Commission (“LUC”) denying their request for declaratory relief. In their petition to the LUC, the Kanaheles requested that the LUC declare that the development of thirteen astronomy facilities, including the Thirty Meter Telescope, created a “de facto industrial use precinct” on Mauna Kea and was not appropriate within a conservation district.
The LUC denied the Kanaheles’ petition for declaratory relief, concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because it is the DLNR, not the LUC, that is “statutorily authorized to determine, permit, and enforce land uses within the State Conservation District.” The Kanaheles filed a direct appeal of the LUC’s decision to the Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi, arguing that the LUC erred in its determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to issue the requested declaratory order.
by Big Island Video News9:44 pm
on at
STORY SUMMARY
HONOLULU, Hawaiʻi - On September 22, the court will hear arguments concerning what appellants say is the "invalid classification of the de facto and improper industrial use" of the Maunakea conservation lands.